Collaboration with Lace Padilla, testing equitable data design techniques for population mortality charts.
This study examines the impacts of public health communications visualizing risk disparities between racial and other social groups. It compares the effects of traditional bar charts to an alternative design emphasizing geographic variability with differing annotations and jitter plots. Whereas both visualization designs increased perceived vulnerability, behavioral intent, and policy support, the geo-emphasized charts were significantly more effective in reducing personal attribution biases. The findings also reveal emotionally taxing experiences for chart viewers from marginalized communities. This work suggests a need for strategic reevaluation of visual communication tools in public health to enhance understanding and engagement without reinforcing stereotypes or emotional distress.
Dispersion vs Disparity: Hiding Variability Can Encourage Stereotyping When Visualizing Social Outcomes
Collaboration with Cindy Xiong Bearfield, exploring the impact of variability on attribution and stereotypes.
Research Paper
Dispersion vs Disparity: Hiding Variability Can Encourage Stereotyping When Visualizing Social Outcomes
Study Details
Dispersion vs Disparity Research Project
Motivation
What Can Go Wrong? Deficit Thinking in Dataviz A collaboration with Pieta Blakely
VIS Talk
Dispersion vs Disparity Presentation for IEEE VIS 2022
Polarizing Political Polls: How Visual ization Design Choices Can Shape Public Opinion and Increase Political Polarization
Collaboration with Cindy Xiong Bearfield, exploring how social normative influences are triggered by charts.
Research Paper
Polarizing Political Polls: How Visualization Design Choices Can Shape Public Opinion and Increase Political Polarization
Study Details
Polarizing Political Polls Research Project
Miscellaneous Related Writing
Sketching Sketchy Bar Charts Understanding how viewers underestimate variability when viewing bar charts of averages.
When is eleven scarier than twelve? Understanding perceptions of relative health risk.
Read the room. The 'ensemble effect' helps explain why Jitter Plots feel so intuitive.
Equitable Epidemiology
3iap Workshop
Equitable Epidemiology: Deep Dive Workshops for Public Health Communicators In these deep-dive workshops, we’ll seek to motivate an elevated duty-of-care for public health data communication, cover techniques for identifying prevalent risks in messaging, and propose alternative, evidence-backed chart choices for common use cases for visualizing population health outcomes.
Visual Villainy
Outlier
Visual Villainy: How to Undermine Humanity with Dataviz Outlier keynote on design considerations for ethical data visualization.
Downstream Detriments
Cimpian & Salomon 2014:
The inherence heuristic: An intuitive means of making sense of the world, and a potential precursor to psychological essentialism
Kite & Whitley 2016
Old-fashioned and contemporary forms of prejudice
Leitner et al 2016
Racial bias is associated with ingroup death rate for Blacks and Whites: Insights from Project Implicit
Brown-Iannuzzi et al 2016
The Relationship Between Mental Representations of Welfare Recipients and Attitudes Toward Welfare
Snowden & Graaf 2019
The 'Undeserving Poor,' Racial Bias, and Medicaid Coverage of African Americans
Gollust & Lynch 2011
Who Deserves Health Care? The Effects of Causal Attributions and Group Cues on Public Attitudes About Responsibility for Health Care Costs
Jhangiani & Tarry 2022
Other Determinants of Helping
Braveman & Dominguez 2021
Abandon 'Race.' Focus on Racism.
Design Matters
Jhangiani & Tarry 2022
Social Categorization and Stereotyping
Wilmer & Kerns 2022
What’s really wrong with bar graphs of mean values: variable and inaccurate communication of evidence on three key dimensions
Holder & Xiong 2022
Dispersion vs Disparity: Hiding Variability Can Encourage Stereotyping When Visualizing Social Outcomes
Cimpian & Salomon 2014
The inherence heuristic: An intuitive means of making sense of the world, and a potential precursor to psychological essentialism
Skitka et al 2002
Dispositions, Scripts, or Motivated Correction? Understanding Ideological Differences in Explanations for Social Problems
Matute et al 2015
Illusions of causality: how they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced